Part 3: {Third Broad Set of Themes}
Theme B: {Humanism, Social Inequality, Poverty & UBI}
Render 1: This is the original render for this theme. It involves an expansion of themes, all quite distinct and varying: {Capitalism, Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Selfishness, Minimum Wage, Freewill, Self, Post Modern Neo Marxists}
Speakers Identified: {Sean Hannity, Cornel West, Noam Chomsky, Steven Crowder, Peter Joseph, Jordan Bernt Peterson, Sam Harris, Ben Shapiro, Richard Wolf Small, Joe Rogan, (IP)}
Highlights: Pursuit of Happiness movie, Experiment with capuchin monkeys, Fox News Hannity, The Majority Report, movie with Michael Douglas (IP), Socialism is Evil, David Doel, Ayn Rand interview (IP), {TV/movie name … IP}
Nguồn: https://thetanglebay.org
Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://thetanglebay.org/game/
Xem thêm Bài Viết:
- Mẹo chơi game bắn cá ăn xu – chơi hoài mà vẫn còn xu
- Can you fight ENDER DRAGON in Craft Vegas (very epic)
- Minecraft: ENDER DRAGON SWALLOWED US RIDE!! – MERRY WORLD RESORT – Custom Map [3]
- Ender's Game (Starring Harrison Ford) Movie Review
- Tomb Raider 9: Modding Showcase-TR6: Angel of Darkness Lara Mod
0:27 I sense Edward Bearnays is around here, somewhere in this video.
i wish these assholes could get reincarnated in a different body and then compare/contrast the different things they're subjected to……jesus fucking christ….to see these assholes reincarnated in a lesser stance (monetarily ) ..and then reevaluate……hey, wait, maybe…..life isnt so great living a shit job that i hate that barely gets me ahead if at all…but hey, i can just be a figurehead and preach the truth of the free market and live a great nice life and even make my kids famous, my daughter only eats meat, nice……go fuck yourself
The face of the guy interviewing Peter Joseph. He's clearly unwilling to talk. When he tells Joseph it's a problem of resources, LOL… Of course it Is, man! You've said it! That's why we have to ground our economy on the problem of resources, not money.
Ben "The strawman" Shapiro got it all figured out for us.
Ben Shapiro is such an obnoxious dipshit.
Thank you for using your time in this way. It's a little hard to follow in places but overall a very solid job, and most importantly, done with good intention and deep wisdom.
Automation and ai run society is a Resource based economy. Capitalists would call it socialism, but they would be wrong. Decisions not made by the biases of a group of ppl but rather by logic and reason thats universally true for everyone.
Ayn Rand wound up on public assistance for the final years of her life. Quite apropos, I think.
In the long run the social safety net allowed her to keep from dying on the street, which is quite unlike the current conservative/libertarian tack today.
Great mixing and matching with opposing arguments! Love the monkey experiment!
As Erich Fromm points out "we are not infinitely malleable or are blank sheets of canvas's however we are a product of social conditioning and there are humanistic virtues, attributes, and modes of living that produces a healthier human being. Drives and motivation do not inherently come from competition when scarcity is not at the forefront. Greed is taught in manifested through a socio-economic system that trains our thought and brain patterns very early on.
Why bother with more words and ideas you will probably not all remember. Let AI come online and sort the mess out. It will either kill or spare. If kill we all unite if spare them we have some options. As either its slaves or its master or in harmony. The end no more words no more ideas. A direction from at last an actual speaking god you can vist. In em cern ?
hopefully the Randian psycopathy will end with Greenspan and his buds including the outgoing Paul Ryan….
Interesting compilation
Ayn Rand was full of rubbish, at least on this topic. Her’s is a completely
materialistic poisonous approach to life. One can hardly call it a philosophy.
Also the animal part of us is only a small part and we can be morally so much more
expansive than animals.
That Interview with Jones had me Railing for Years…
The government doesn't want the lower and middle classes to start their own businesses and come together politically. If that were to happen then the top 1 percent would exponentially start losing their power they've acquired over centuries of exploitation. That's why Democrats and Republicans ultimately serve the elite! Economic power is political power!
Hmm, it all comes down to benefiting ourselves. We are unquestionably motivated by benefit. It takes some deep thought to finally conclude that benefitting yourself by cheating others of benefit actually decreases your chances of future benefit. You can actually be selfish and benefit others to increase your own benefit. I like to call this enlightened selfishness, because it's a holistic view of thinking about yourself.
Greed and desire to have benefit are quite similar. What makes greed problematic is the associated exclusion of benefit for others. The exclusion aspect even characterizes greed. To me, the problem is not about who gets to take what from who, but the fact that people are feeling excluded from benefit. This happens whether you have a little money left over for food, and the bills come in, while your neighbor is washing his new sporty car, or if you've spent a lifetime accumulating wealth to provide your family with a high standard of living and others are demanding that you pay higher taxes for social causes. In both cases, you could feel that people are trying to make your life worse.
So, I think the answer is to think about how we can benefit others while benefiting ourselves. Or, as Dr. Peterson suggests, help ourselves first, and then help others. It's hard to know where to draw the line though, there's so many people that seem to need help. While it's easy to say that people should help themselves, in some situations it's difficult if not near impossible to do things on your own… or it takes way a lot more time than necessary, even if you have your head on straight.
It's a problem, you can't help everyone who needs help, and you can't just put your head in the sand and take everything for yourself. I wouldn't expect others to help me if they feel it would work against their quality of life, and I wouldn't want to be expected to help someone if it works against my quality of life. Mutual respect, individual responsibility, charitable heart. No one said you can't volunteer to help others. If there was a way to voluntarily contribute to a UBI cause for every person on the planet, that sounds like a good idea to me, but managing it properly in a world where so many people neglect the desires of others, sounds like a difficult task.
Rather, it seems that our views of gaining benefit causes a lot of confusion, it becomes a never ending task. Isn't it interesting that the effects of giving and receiving both seem to be positive experiences? Isn't it interesting that power is gained where mutual interest is involved? Isn't it interesting that we feel loneliness when separated from people who we think benefit us? Isn't it interesting how people fall into groups? Isn't it interesting that families and children are the most treasured things in our lives? Isn't it interesting that the same things make us happy, or sad? Isn't it obvious that we should work towards aligning our interests and work towards a world focused on mutual benefit? Hmm, well, it is to me.
Great stuff David. Your Rand vs Harris dialogue was played out nicely with Candice Owens on Russell Brand's podcast yesterday. You're in the zone.